Key result
IV thrombolysis linked to ~10% higher delayed reperfusion rate after incomplete thrombectomy.
Why the study?
Does intravenous thrombolysis improve delayed reperfusion in ischemic stroke patients with incomplete reperfusion after thrombectomy?
Observational (n=832)
Yes
Does intravenous thrombolysis improve delayed reperfusion in ischemic stroke patients with incomplete reperfusion after thrombectomy?
Intravenous thrombolysis is associated with a higher rate of delayed reperfusion at 24 hours in ischemic stroke patients who have incomplete reperfusion after thrombectomy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More than half of the endovascularly treated ischemic stroke patients with incomplete reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] <3) show delayed reperfusion (DR) on 24-hour perfusion imaging, which is associated with favorable clinical outcome. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the rates of DR remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the treatment effect of IVT on the occurrence of DR. METHODS: Pooled data from 3 randomized controlled trials (EXTEND-IA and EXTEND-IA TNK parts 1 and 2) and 2 comprehensive stroke centers (University Hospitals Graz and Bern) were analyzed. Only patients with a final reperfusion score of eTICI 2a-2c and available perfusion imaging at follow-up of 24 ± 12 hours were included. The primary outcome was the presence of DR on 24-hour follow-up CT/MRI perfusion imaging, defined as the absence of any focal perfusion deficit on perfusion imaging, despite incomplete reperfusion on the final angiography series during thrombectomy. For the secondary analysis, we explored the association between the primary outcome (DR) and the time elapsed between start of IVT and the end of an intervention. To address confounding in observational data, we performed a target trial emulation. RESULTS: Of 832 included patients with eTICI 2a-2c (median age 74 years, 49% female), 511 (61%) had DR. There was an independent treatment effect of IVT on DR (standardized risk ratio [sRR] 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.3; standardized risk difference [sRD] 8.2%, 95% CI 0.2%-16.1%), after adjusting for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, number of device passes, collateral score, and eTICI. Among those patients who have received IVT (n = 524/832, 63%), when adjusting for the aforementioned covariates, there was a causal effect of shorter time between administration of thrombolytics and end of the intervention on DR (sRR 0.93%, 95% CI 0.87-0.98; sRD -5.2%; 95% CI -9.1% to -1.3%, per hour increase). DISCUSSION: Exposure to thrombolytics showed independent treatment effect on the occurrence of DR among patients with incomplete reperfusion after thrombectomy who undergo perfusion imaging at the 24-hour follow-up. The effect of thrombolytics on DR was observed if there was a high chance of therapeutic concentrations of thrombolytics at the time point when the proximal vessel was recanalized, but distal occlusions persisted and/or occurred. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study is rated Class III because it is a nonrandomized study and there are substantial differences in baseline characteristics of the treatment groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mujanović et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke with incomplete reperfusion after thrombectomy (n=832). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) vs. No intravenous thrombolysis was evaluated on Presence of delayed reperfusion (DR) on 24-hour follow-up CT/MRI perfusion imaging (sRR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.3). Intravenous thrombolysis was associated with an increased likelihood of delayed reperfusion at 24 hours in patients with incomplete reperfusion after thrombectomy (sRR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: