Key result
High-voltage PFA achieves 100% procedural success for NICM VT despite notable recurrence and defibrillator malfunctions.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy is challenging due to deep and heterogeneous myocardial substrates, prompting investigation into whether high-voltage pulsed field ablation is safe and feasible.
Does high-voltage pulsed field ablation improve procedural success and safety in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular tachycardia?
Observational (n=7)
No
Does high-voltage pulsed field ablation improve procedural success and safety in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular tachycardia?
High-voltage pulsed field ablation is highly effective for achieving acute procedural success in refractory VT, but poses significant safety concerns regarding electromagnetic interference with implantable defibrillators and mapping systems.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) remains particularly challenging, as arrhythmogenic substrates are often deep and heterogeneous within the myocardium. To overcome these limitations, a novel high-voltage pulsed field ablation (hv-PFA) system is under investigation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of hv-PFA during VT ablation. METHODS: This single-center series included consecutive NICM patients undergoing repeat ablation of recurrent monomorphic VT with an 8.5-F force-sensing hv-PFA catheter between July 2024 and August 2025. A scar homogenization approach was used in all patients. Procedural success was defined as noninducibility of any VT and absence of residual abnormal electrograms within bipolar voltage area <1.5 mV. Device and mapping system integrity was monitored during the procedure. Follow-up data were collected during in-office evaluations and remote device monitoring. RESULTS: Seven consecutive patients (mean age 58 ± 10.4 years; 1 female [14.3%]) underwent a total of 9 procedures, as 1 patient underwent 3 ablations for VT recurrence. The mean number of prior procedures was 2.29 ± 1.11. A scar homogenization strategy was applied in all procedures (median 14 lesions [Q1-Q3: 9-17 lesions]). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. During a median follow-up of 10 months (320 days [Q1-Q3: 183-407 days]), arrhythmic recurrence occurred after 3 (33.3%) of 9 procedures in 2 (28.6%) of 7 patients. Electromagnetic interference resulted in defibrillator malfunction in 2 (22.2%) procedures, requiring generator replacement, and mapping system malfunction in 3 (33.3%) procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings from this prospective series show efficacy of hv-PFA in NICM patients with prior multiple unsuccessful VT ablations. Further studies are required to define the safety profile of this novel ablation system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiarazzo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n=7). High-voltage pulsed field ablation (hv-PFA) was evaluated on Procedural success (noninducibility of any VT and absence of residual abnormal electrograms). High-voltage pulsed field ablation achieved procedural success in 100% of NICM patients with recurrent VT, though arrhythmic recurrence occurred in 28.6% and defibrillator malfunction in 22.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: