Key result
EPA treatment was an independent predictor of reduced cardiac events in chronic heart failure patients with dyslipidemia (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05-0.93; p=0.031).
Why the study?
Does eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) reduce cardiac events and improve cardiac function in chronic heart failure patients with dyslipidemia?
Cohort (n=139)
Does eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) reduce cardiac events and improve cardiac function in chronic heart failure patients with dyslipidemia?
Effect estimate: HR 0.21 (95% CI 0.05-0.93)
p-value: p=0.031
Should not yet change practice in HF with dyslipidemia; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for RCTs to confirm benefit.
AIMS: The effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on the levels of inflammatory markers, cardiac function and long-term prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with dyslipidemia remain unclear. METHODS: A total of 139 CHF patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 37.6± 8.0% were divided into two groups based on whether EPA was included in their treatment regimen: the EPA group (n=71) and the no EPA group (n=68). Only patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (entry) were treated with EPA. The monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels were measured at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: At 12 months, in the EPA group, the LVEF had improved and the MCP-1 and ADMA levels had decreased (respectively, p<0.001); however, in the no EPA group, the LVEF had worsened, while the MCP-1 and ADMA levels had increased (respectively, p<0.001). Fifty-five patients experienced cardiac events, including 15 cardiac deaths and 40 readmissions for worsening of CHF during a median follow-up period of 28.0 months. The percent change in LVEF from baseline was found to be significantly associated with the percent change in ADMA (r=-0.462, p<0.001). A multivariate Cox hazard analysis showed EPA treatment (hazard ratio: 0.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.93, p=0.031) to be an independent predictor of cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that EPA treatment may improve the cardiac function and long-term prognosis of CHF patients with dyslipidemia, at least in part, due to reductions in inflammation and improvements in the endothelial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohashi et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure with dyslipidemia (n=139). Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) vs. No EPA was evaluated on Cardiac events (cardiac deaths and readmissions for worsening of CHF) (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.93, p=0.031). EPA treatment was an independent predictor of reduced cardiac events in chronic heart failure patients with dyslipidemia (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05-0.93; p=0.031).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: