Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Creative, robust, and “moody” theories of action seek to modify a traditional voluntarism by attending to perception (broadly considered). Consolidating these theories as variants of an aesthetic sociology, I consider inspiration as one of the earliest stages in a larger theory of social action. Inspiration is narrower than creativity—it does not depend on audience recognition or valuation—but it offers a window into the prior dynamics of receptivity and anticipation. Close empirical study is possible. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with fashion designers, I analyze the spatial and material infrastructure of inspiration. I show how designers engage with space and materiality in their work, as well as how they utilize artistic license to tweak existing runway designs. I conclude with possibilities for future research and argue for the role of inspiration as a micro foundation of action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander D. Hoppe (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: