Key result
Lower LVMI-adjusted LVEF linked to ~615% higher MACE risk in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Diagnosing early diabetic cardiomyopathy remains challenging due to a lack of specific parameters, particularly in primary care settings with only conventional echocardiography machines.
Does left ventricular mass index-adjusted ejection fraction (LVMI-EF) predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=419)
Does left ventricular mass index-adjusted ejection fraction (LVMI-EF) predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: OR 7.1505 (95% CI 3.1644-16.1576)
p-value: p=0.001
LVMI-adjusted LVEF may help identify early diabetic cardiomyopathy and strongly predicts MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes.
May aid MACE risk stratification in T2DM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) serves as a specific risk marker for cardiac failure and elevated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, diagnosing early DbCM cases remains challenging due to the lack of specific parameters, especially in primary care settings equipped only with conventional echocardiography machines. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of left ventricular mass index-adjusted ejection fraction (LVMI-EF) on the assessment of early DbCM and its relationship with MACE in patients with type 2 DM. Materials and Methods: Echocardiographic data from 419 patients were analyzed, calculated their LVMI-EF, and compared against measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with lower LVMI-EF were considered to have DbCM. Subsequently, all the patients were followed up for a mean period of 2 years. Results: After adjusting for LVMI, LVEF in the normal range decreased by 12%(p=<0.001), while there was an increase of mild, moderate and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction categories by 7.87% (p=<0.001),1.8% (p=0.5614)and 1.4% (p=0.5614) respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of MACE in patients with lower LVMI-EF (presumed to have DbCM; P = 0.001; odds ratio = 7.1505; 95% confidence interval: 3.1644–16.1576). Conclusion: LVMI adjustment of LVEF is a valuable tool for identifying DbCM, particularly in its early stages, and LVMI-EF serves as a prognostic indicator for MACE in type 2 DM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sureshkumar et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=419). Left ventricular mass index-adjusted ejection fraction (LVMI-EF) vs. Measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 7.1505, 95% CI 3.1644-16.1576, p=0.001). Lower left ventricular mass index-adjusted ejection fraction was associated with a higher risk of MACE in type 2 diabetes patients (OR 7.1505; 95% CI 3.1644-16.1576; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: