Key result
Guideline-concordant pre-operative imaging for colon cancer increased significantly over time, from 31% in 2002-2004 to 64% in 2006-2008 (P<0.001).
Why the study?
What factors are associated with the utilization of pre-operative imaging for colon cancer in routine clinical practice?
Cohort (n=7,249)
Yes
What factors are associated with the utilization of pre-operative imaging for colon cancer in routine clinical practice?
Guideline-concordant pre-operative imaging for colon cancer increased significantly over time, though overall adherence remained suboptimal.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite rising adherence, rates remain suboptimal; leaves open modifiable factors to further improve guideline-concordant imaging in colon cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of pre-operative imaging for colon cancer and to identify factors associated with utilization in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used a random sample of 25% of colon cancer patients treated with surgery in the province of Ontario (2002-2008). Pre-operative imaging (<16 weeks from surgery) of the chest, abdomen-pelvis was identified. Modified poisson regression was used to analyze factors associated with practice patterns. RESULTS: Of the 7,249 included patients, 48% had pre-operative imaging (CT abdomen and imaging of the chest) in keeping with guideline recommendations. The rate of guideline concordant pre-operative imaging increased over time: 64% in the most recent study period (2006-2008) versus 31% (2002-2004); P < 0.001. Variables associated with use of chest imaging: Age, co-morbidity, surgeon volume, and geographic region; no association with gender, hospital volume, or socio-economic status. Variables associated with use of abdomen imaging: Hospital volume and geographic region; no association with age, gender, comorbidity, socio-economic status, or surgeon volume. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, the majority of patients were not receiving pre-operative imaging that was in line with clinical practice guidelines; however, use increased over time indicating a possible association with dissemination of clinical practice guidelines. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:202-207.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McInnes et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Colon cancer (n=7,249). Pre-operative imaging vs. Historical practice (2002-2004 vs 2006-2008) was evaluated on Guideline concordant pre-operative imaging (CT abdomen and imaging of the chest) (p=< 0.001). Guideline-concordant pre-operative imaging for colon cancer increased significantly over time, from 31% in 2002-2004 to 64% in 2006-2008 (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: