Why the study?
Does routine pre-operative chest radiography alter anaesthetic management in patients undergoing elective surgery?
Does routine pre-operative chest radiography alter anaesthetic management in patients undergoing elective surgery?
Routine pre-operative chest radiography rarely alters anaesthetic management in healthy, young patients, but its utility increases in older males with comorbidities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support selective over routine preoperative chest radiography in higher-risk patients; leaves open impact on outcomes.
A prospective multicentre pilot study was undertaken in 20 Italian hospitals to assess the influence of a routine pre-operative chest radiograph on anaesthetic management and to characterise which patients might benefit from it. A total of 6111 patients undergoing elective surgery and submitted for routine pre-operative chest radiograph were enrolled. Abnormal preoperative chest radiographs were reported in 1116 patients (18.3%). Pre-operative chest radiograph altered the anaesthetic management (i.e. useful pre-operative chest radiograph) in 313 patients (5.1%). Male sex, age > 60 years, ASA classes > or = 3, respiratory diseases, and the presence of two or more co-existing diseases were significantly related to the probability of a useful pre-operative chest radiograph using multivariate analysis (P < 0.01). The classification of the surgical intervention and, of the co-existing diseases, the presence of cardiac disease had a very low influence when determining the probability that a pre-operative chest radiograph would be useful. A simple equation includes the effects of all the variables studied and allows calculation of the probability of a useful pre-operative chest radiograph. This study indicates that in healthy, female, < or = 60-year-old patients, submitted for standard surgery, the probability of a useful pre-operative chest radiograph ranges from 0.2% to 3.5% according to the hospital. The probability increases in male or elderly subjects, or in the presence of co-existing respiratory diseases, or in ASA classes > or = 3, but there is a wide variation between hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. Silvestri (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: