Key result
First Nations patients were significantly less likely to receive coronary angiography within 1 day after acute myocardial infarction compared with non-First Nations patients (adjusted OR 0.73).
Why the study?
Does First Nations status affect the likelihood of receiving coronary angiography and long-term survival among adults with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=46,764)
Does First Nations status affect the likelihood of receiving coronary angiography and long-term survival among adults with acute myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.62-0.87)
First Nations patients with acute MI experience significant disparities in care, being less likely to receive timely coronary angiography and having worse long-term survival compared to non-First Nations patients.
Suggests care disparities in timely angiography for First Nations AMI patients; leaves open causal factors and equity interventions.
BACKGROUND: Morbidity due to cardiovascular disease is high among First Nations people. The extent to which this may be related to the likelihood of coronary angiography is unclear. We examined the likelihood of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction (MI) among First Nations and non-First Nations patients. METHODS: Our study included adults with incident acute MI between 1997 and 2008 in Alberta. We determined the likelihood of angiography among First Nations and non-First Nations patients, adjusted for important confounders, using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database. RESULTS: Of the 46,764 people with acute MI, 1043 (2.2%) were First Nations. First Nations patients were less likely to receive angiography within 1 day after acute MI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87). Among First Nations and non-First Nations patients who underwent angiography (64.9%), there was no difference in the likelihood of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.25). First Nations people had worse survival if they received medical management alone (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.77) or if they underwent PCI (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06-1.80), whereas survival was similar among First Nations and non-First Nations patients who received CABG. INTERPRETATION: First Nations people were less likely to undergo angiography after acute MI and experienced worse long-term survival compared with non-First Nations people. Efforts to improve access to angiography for First Nations people may improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bresee et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=46,764). First Nations status vs. Non-First Nations status was evaluated on Receipt of coronary angiography within 1 day after admission for acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87). First Nations patients were significantly less likely to receive coronary angiography within 1 day after acute myocardial infarction compared with non-First Nations patients (adjusted OR 0.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: