Key result
First Nations patients had a higher adjusted risk of 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.25-1.89) and cardiovascular mortality than non-First Nations patients following index angiography.
Why the study?
In Canada, First Nations people face higher mortality following index angiography than the general population, but this disparity had not been examined while considering guideline-recommended cardiovascular medication use.
Does First Nations status affect 5-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients following diagnostic angiography?
Cohort
Does First Nations status affect 5-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients following diagnostic angiography?
Hazard Ratio: 1.54 (95% CI 1.25–1.89)
First Nations patients have a significantly higher risk of 5-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality following diagnostic angiography compared to non-First Nations patients, a disparity not explained by differences in cardiovascular medication adherence.
Higher mortality risk in First Nations patients post-angiography warrants clinical attention to disparities; leaves open causal mechanisms and equity-focused trials.
Background In Canada, First Nations (FN) people are at greater risk of mortality than the general population following index angiography. This disparity has not been investigated while considering guideline-recommended cardiovascular medication use. Methods and Results Retrospective analysis of administrative health data investigated patterns of medication dispensation during the first year after index angiography among patients in Manitoba, Canada. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) reflecting the percentage of days in which medications were supplied were calculated separately for β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, and antiplatelets (clopidogrel). Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 categories: (1) not dispensed (0% MPR), (2) low (1-39% MPR), (3) intermediate (40-79% MPR), (4) high (≥80% MPR). Cox regression models that adjusted for MPR categories were used to explore the association between FN patients and both 5-year all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. FN patients were less likely to have an intermediate MPR (odds ratio: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.99) or a high MPR (odds ratio: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81) for statin medications than non-FN patients. FN patients also had higher adjusted risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than non-FN patients (hazard ratio, all-cause: 1.54 [95% CI, 1.25-1.89]; cardiovascular: 1.62 [95% CI, 1.16-2.25]). Conclusions FN status was independently associated with intermediate and high MPRs for statins during the first year following index angiography among patients with known ischemic heart disease. Differences in MPR categories did not explain the disparity in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality between the 2 populations. Reduction of cardiovascular disparities may be best addressed using primary prevention strategies that include decolonizing policies and practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahl et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart disease following diagnostic angiography. First Nations status vs. Non-First Nations patients was evaluated on 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.89). First Nations patients had a higher adjusted risk of 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.25-1.89) and cardiovascular mortality than non-First Nations patients following index angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: