Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article attempts to demonstrate that the politics of gender in Turkey is intrinsic rather than incidental to a characterization of its ruling ideology. It does so by focusing on three central nodes of ideology and practice in three domains: first, the use of gender as a central pillar of populism and a marker of difference that pits an authentically national ‘us’ against an anti-national ‘them’; second, the marriage of convenience between neo-liberal welfare and employment policies and (neo)- conservative familialism and finally, the ‘normalization’ of violence in everyday political discourse and practice. It concludes that soaring levels of gender-based and societal violence are not indicative of a securely entrenched patriarchy but of a crisis in the gender order and the polity more generally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deniz Kandiyoti (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: