Key result
Heart failure in dabigatran-treated AF patients is linked to ~164% higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The study aimed to describe baseline characteristics of AF patients at risk of stroke with and without HF history and report 2-year outcomes in dabigatran-treated patients.
Do clinical outcomes differ between dabigatran-treated newly diagnosed AF patients with and without a history of heart failure?
Observational (n=15,308)
Yes
Do clinical outcomes differ between dabigatran-treated newly diagnosed AF patients with and without a history of heart failure?
In patients with newly diagnosed AF treated with dabigatran, those with a history of HF have higher mortality but comparable rates of stroke and major bleeding compared to those without HF, confirming the long-term safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HF patients on dabigatran for new AF may need closer monitoring; leaves open whether HF modifies net benefit in randomized data.
Aims This study aimed to describe baseline characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk of stroke with and without history of heart failure (HF) and report 2-year outcomes in the dabigatran-treated subset of a prospective, global, observational study (GLORIA-AF). Methods and results Newly diagnosed patients with AF and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 were consecutively enrolled. Baseline characteristics were assessed by the presence or absence of HF diagnosis at enrolment. Incidence rates for outcomes in dabigatran-treated patients were estimated with and without standardization by stroke (excluding HF component) and bleeding risk scores. A total of 15 308 eligible patients were enrolled, including 15 154 with known HF status; of these, 3679 (24.0%) had been diagnosed with HF, 11 475 (75.0%) had not. Among 4873 dabigatran-treated patients, 1169 (24.0%) had HF, and 3658 (75.1%) did not; the risk of stroke was high (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2) for 94.3% of patients with HF and 85.8% without, while 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively, had a high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED ≥ 3). Incidence rates of all-cause death in dabigatran-treated patients with and without HF, standardized for CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, were 4.76 vs. 1.80 per 100 patient years (py), with roughly comparable rates of stroke (0.82 vs. 0.60 per 100 py) and major bleeding (1.20 vs. 0.92 per 100 py). Conclusions Patients with AF and history of HF may have greater disease burden at AF diagnosis and increased mortality rates vs. patients without HF. Stroke and major bleeding rates were roughly comparable between groups confirming the long-term safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubner et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=15,308). Dabigatran vs. Patients without heart failure was evaluated on All-cause death. Dabigatran-treated AF patients with heart failure had higher standardized rates of all-cause death than those without heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: