Key result
MRI proves relatively safe for CIED patients due to improved device and protocol designs.
Why the study?
Despite documentation and guideline recommendations on safety, significant skepticism persists regarding performing MRI in patients with CIEDs.
Is it safe to perform MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Is it safe to perform MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
This review provides an overview of MRI and CIED interactions and suggests a protocol for safely performing MRI in patients with CIEDs.
May support protocol-guided MRI in select CIED patients; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a commonly used non-ionizing radiation dependent imaging modality which has an excellent spatial resolution with the capability to provide physiological information. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are used in modern cardiology with a frequency of 1:50 over 75 years of age and nearly one in three people in this population required MRI during their lifetime. Changes in the CIED structure, electronics, and algorithms paired with changes in the protocol design of MRI have created a relatively safe environment for performing MRI in patients with CIED. Despite their documentation in literature and a guideline document from a professional society, significant skepticism exists in doing MRI in patients with CIEDs. We intend to give an overview of interactions between MRI and CIEDs, including the evidence available in this regard and conclude with the suggestion of a protocol for safely carrying out an MRI in patients with CIEDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deshpande et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices is relatively safe due to changes in device structure, electronics, and MRI protocol design.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: