Key result
Individualized V6 R-wave peak time criterion identifies His bundle capture with 100% sensitivity.
Why the study?
During non-selective His bundle pacing, confirming His bundle capture versus right ventricular septal capture is clinically important.
Does an individualized left ventricular lateral wall activation time criterion (delta V6RWPT) accurately diagnose His bundle capture compared to fixed ECG cut-offs in patients with permanent His bundle pacing?
Observational (n=219)
Single-blind
No
Does an individualized left ventricular lateral wall activation time criterion (delta V6RWPT) accurately diagnose His bundle capture compared to fixed ECG cut-offs in patients with permanent His bundle pacing?
Absolute Event Rate: 99.9% vs 97.8%
p-value: p=<0.01
An individualized ECG criterion using native left ventricular activation time as a reference accurately differentiates His bundle capture from right ventricular septal capture, outperforming fixed QRS duration cut-offs.
May aid His bundle capture confirmation on ECG; supports individualized criteria but leaves open need for prospective validation.
Aims During non-selective His bundle (HB) pacing, it is clinically important to confirm His bundle capture vs. right ventricular septal (RVS) capture. The present study aimed to validate the hypothesis that during HB capture left ventricular lateral wall activation time, approximated by the V 6 R-wave peak time (V 6 RWPT), will not be longer than the corresponding activation time during native conduction. Methods Consecutive patients with permanent HB pacing were recruited; cases with abnormal His-ventricle interval or left bundle branch block were excluded. Two corresponding intervals were compared: stimulus-V 6 RWPT and native HBpotential-V 6 RWPT. Difference between these two intervals (delta V 6 RWPT), diagnostic of lack of HB capture, was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results A total of 723 ECGs (219 with native rhythm, 172 with selective HB, 215 with non-selective HB, and 117 with RVS capture) were obtained from 219 patients. The native HB-V 6 RWPT, non-selective-, and selective-HB paced V 6 RWPT were nearly equal, while RVS V 6 RWPT was 32.0 (±9.5) ms longer. The ROC curve analysis indicated delta V 6 RWPT > 12 ms as diagnostic of lack of HB capture (specificity of 99.1% and sensitivity of 100%). A blinded observer correctly diagnosed 96.7% (321/332) of ECGs using this criterion. Conclusion We validated a novel criterion for HB capture that is based on the physiological left ventricular activation time as an individualized reference. HB capture can be diagnosed when paced V 6 RWPT does not exceed the value obtained during native conduction by more than 12 ms, while longer paced V 6 RWPT indicates RVS capture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jastrzębski et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Bradycardia and/or heart failure requiring conduction system pacing (n=219). Individualized V6 R-wave peak time (delta V6RWPT) criterion vs. Fixed cut-off V6RWPT criterion was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve for diagnosis of His bundle capture (p=<0.01). An individualized criterion for His bundle capture, defined as a paced V6 R-wave peak time not exceeding the native conduction value by more than 12 ms, accurately diagnosed His bundle capture with 100% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: