Key result
Parvovirus B19 myocarditis presents with variable features requiring CMR and EMB for accurate diagnosis.
Why the study?
The clinical relevance and pathological roles of Parvovirus B19 and human herpesvirus-6 in acute viral myocarditis remain questioned despite being the most commonly identified viruses.
This review highlights the clinical relevance and controversies surrounding Parvovirus B19 as a common viral pathogen in acute myocarditis.
Variable presentations support including Parvovirus B19 in myocarditis differentials; leaves open standardized diagnostic algorithms for prospective study.
Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart muscle, most often caused by viral infections. Its diagnosis can be difficult due to the heterogeneity of presentations that often mimic other common cardiological conditions, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and heart failure. Although most cases are benign and self-limiting, it can also take on a more malignant course complicated by life-threatening arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, and sudden cardiac death (SCD). A certain proportion of patients progress to develop dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMO). The developed world has experienced a shift in viral pathogens detected in patients with acute myocarditis over the past 20 years, and Parvovirus B19 (PVB19) and human herpesvirus-6 (HHV6) are currently the most commonly identified viruses in the myocardium of patients with viral myocarditis. The clinical relevance and pathological roles of these viruses however remain questioned. This focused review aims to use 2 cases of PVB19 myocarditis managed by our unit to explore issues related to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of PVB19 myocarditis along with controversies surrounding the pathogenic role and clinical relevance of PVB19 in myocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2022) conducted a review in Parvovirus B19 Myocarditis (n=2). Parvovirus B19 myocarditis presents with highly variable clinical features ranging from pseudo-infarct to heart failure, requiring cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy for accurate diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: