Why the study?
Do phenprocoumon plasma levels and maintenance doses correlate reliably enough with prothrombin time to replace PT monitoring?
Do phenprocoumon plasma levels and maintenance doses correlate reliably enough with prothrombin time to replace PT monitoring?
Due to significant inter-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, phenprocoumon therapy requires routine prothrombin time monitoring rather than relying on fixed dosing or plasma level measurements.
No data available to guide phenprocoumon monitoring changes; leaves correlation with PT open for prospective study.
Anticoagulants of the cumarin-type (warfarin, phenprocoumon, and acenocoumarol) are drugs for the long-term treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders. Because of their narrow therapeutic range, many patients have bleedings of variable severity or have recurrent thrombotic events. For this reason, the study of the pharmacokinetic parameters of phenprocoumon (PPC), considering its influence on blood clotting factors, is of high interest. The elimination kinetics of PPC, its interaction with phytomenadion (vitamin K), and the pharmacokinetic behavior of the anticoagulant under steady-state conditions have been investigated in studies with healthy volunteers and patients taking anticoagulants. The maintenance dose and the plasma levels of PPC were correlated with prothrombin time (PT) in 89 patients treated with PPC. Varying parameters in each patient (e.g., elimination kinetics of PPC, activity of the cumarin-dependent blood-clotting factors, endogenous phytomenadion stores), render it impossible to use a different means of monitoring than that of PT determination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knut-Olaf Haustein (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: