Key result
Strict rate control reduces hsTnI by ~13% versus lenient control in elderly permanent AF.
Why the study?
To evaluate myocardial injury and tissue hemodynamics in elderly patients with permanent AF based on the achieved range of ventricular contraction rate.
Does strict ventricular rate control (60-79 bpm) reduce myocardial injury and improve tissue hemodynamics compared to lenient rate control (80-100 bpm) in elderly patients with permanent atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=75)
blind
permuted-block design
Does strict ventricular rate control (60-79 bpm) reduce myocardial injury and improve tissue hemodynamics compared to lenient rate control (80-100 bpm) in elderly patients with permanent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 9.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Stricter ventricular rate control (60-79 bpm) in elderly patients with permanent AF is associated with a more pronounced reduction in myocardial injury (hsTn) compared to lenient control (80-100 bpm).
Favors stricter rate control (60-79 bpm) to lessen myocardial injury in elderly permanent AF; extends rate-control trials to hsTn endpoints.
Objective To evaluate myocardial injury and tissue hemodynamics in elderly patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) based on the achieved range of ventricular contraction rate (VCR).Materials and Methods This prospective, randomized, blind study included 75 patients aged ≥60 with permanent AF. All patients were prescribed bisoprolol as a VCR-reducing therapy. Patients were randomized to two groups according to the permuted-block design based on the range of resting VCR goal: group 1, 60-79 bpm (n=38) and group 2, 80-100 bpm (n=37). All patients also received perindopril and apixaban. Troponin I concentration was measured using the high-sensitivity assay (hsTn); parameters of tissue hemodynamics, including the mean blood flow velocity (Vm) and pulsatility index (PI), were measured using high-frequency ultrasound doppler flowmetry; echocardiographic indexes of left heart remodeling were recorded at baseline and after 6 month of VCR monitoring.Results Mean age of patients was 74±7 years. Medians [25th percentile; 75th percentile] of baseline hsTn concentrations were 10.2 [5.25; 21.2] ng / l in group 1 and 10.3 [5.4; 20.4] ng / ml in group 2 (p=0.91). 89.5 % of patients in group 1 and 100 % of patients in group 2 achieved the VCR range goal. At 6 month, resting VCRs were 70±4 bpm in group 1 (n=34) and 88±5 bpm in group 2 (n=37) (p1, p2<0.001). According to echocardiographic data significant progression of myocardial remodeling was not observed. Concentrations of hsTn significantly decreased in both groups but the decrease was more pronounced in group 1, to 8.0 [4.13; 17.23; p1<0.001] ng / l vs. 9.2 [4.8, 17.5] ng / l in group 2 (р1, p2<0.001). A weak direct correlation was found between the VCR decrease and hsTn concentration (rs=0.44; p=0.009 in group 1, and rs=0.41; p=0.01 in group 2); regression coefficient was 0.78 at 95 % confidence interval (CI), from 0.21 to 1.3 (p=0.009) in group 1, and 0.14 at 95 % CI, from 0.04 to 0.24 (p=0.007) in group 2. Vm values were increased to 2.93±0.10 (p<0.001) and 3.21±0.09 cm / sec (p<0.001) and PIs were decreased to 1.42±0.03 conv. units (p<0.01) and to 1.34±0.02 conv. units (p<0.001) in groups 1 and 2, respectively.Conclusion The treatment aimed at VCR control in patients older than 60 with permanent AF was associated with a positive dynamics of myocardial injury (hsTn) and tissue hemodynamics indexes (Vm и РI). This indicates a possibility for using these indexes for further improvement of managing such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Кanorskiy et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in permanent atrial fibrillation (n=75). Ventricular rate control goal 60-79 bpm (bisoprolol) vs. Ventricular rate control goal 80-100 bpm was evaluated on high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTn) concentration at 6 months (p=<0.001). Ventricular rate control of 60-79 bpm in elderly patients with permanent AF led to a greater decrease in high-sensitivity troponin I (8.0 vs 9.2 ng/l; p<0.001) compared to a target of 80-100 bpm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: