Key result
Higher weight-adjusted waist index is linked to ~106% greater CAD risk, outperforming BMI.
Why the study?
Traditional measures like BMI do not fully capture CAD risk associated with body fat distribution, whereas the weight-adjusted waist index may provide a more precise evaluation of central adiposity and cardiovascular risks.
Does the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) improve the detection of coronary artery disease compared to body mass index (BMI) in the general US population?
Cross-Sectional (n=49,240)
Yes
Does the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) improve the detection of coronary artery disease compared to body mass index (BMI) in the general US population?
The weight-adjusted waist index is a superior anthropometric measure compared to BMI for detecting coronary artery disease risk, particularly in younger adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
WWI was associated with CAD beyond BMI; hypothesis-generating for detection, should not yet change practice.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, highlighting the need for improved risk assessment tools. Traditional measures like body mass index (BMI) do not fully capture the risk associated with body fat distribution. The weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) has emerged as a potential anthropometric measure that may provide a more precise evaluation of central adiposity and its cardiovascular risks. We analyzed data from 49,240 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2020. Participants were stratified into quartiles based on WWI: Q1 (WWI < 10.43), Q2 (10.43 ≤ WWI < 10.99), Q3 (10.99 ≤ WWI < 11.56), and Q4 (WWI ≥ 11.56). The primary outcome was self-reported coronary artery disease (CAD). Multivariate logistic regression, generalized additive models, and stratified analyses were conducted. The predictive performance of WWI versus body mass index (BMI) for CAD was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with differences in area under the curve (AUC) evaluated by DeLong's test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a positive association between WWI and CAD prevalence, which persisted after adjusting for confounding variables. Higher WWI was associated with increased risk of CAD, with Group 4 showing the highest risk compared to Group 1 (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37-3.09, P < 0.001). This relationship was not observed between BMI and CAD risk. Subgroup analysis revealed that the association between WWI and CAD prevalence was more pronounced in participants aged ≤ 60 years (P for interaction < 0.001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that WWI had superior predictive ability for CAD compared to BMI (AUC 0.694 vs. 0.547, De-long test P < 0.001). WWI demonstrated a stronger association with CAD prevalence compared to BMI in the US population, with this relationship particularly pronounced among younger adults. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=49,240). Weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) vs. Lowest WWI quartile (Q1) was evaluated on Prevalence of self-reported coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37-3.09, p=<0.001). Higher weight-adjusted waist index was associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (OR 2.06) and demonstrated superior predictive ability compared to body mass index.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: