Key result
The presence of microvascular injury after acute myocardial infarction significantly lowered native T1 values (1048 vs 1111 ms) and T2 values (20 vs 31 ms) in the infarct core.
Why the study?
Does the presence of microvascular injury affect native T1 and T2 relaxation values in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=43)
Single-blind
No
Does the presence of microvascular injury affect native T1 and T2 relaxation values in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction?
The presence of microvascular injury and intramyocardial hemorrhage significantly lowers native T1 and T2 values in the infarct core, which must be accounted for to avoid misclassifying damaged myocardium as normal on non-contrast CMR.
Microvascular injury may bias native T1/T2 mapping post-reperfused AMI; leaves open optimal non-contrast CMR thresholds for tissue characterization.
OBJECTIVES: Native T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging offer detailed characterisation of the myocardium after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the effects of microvascular injury (MVI) and intramyocardial haemorrhage on local T1 and T2* values in patients with a reperfused AMI. METHODS: Forty-three patients after reperfused AMI underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 4 [3-5] days, including native MOLLI T1 and T2* mapping, STIR, cine imaging and LGE. T1 and T2* values were determined in LGE-defined regions of interest: the MI core incorporating MVI when present, the core-adjacent MI border zone (without any areas of MVI), and remote myocardium. RESULTS: Average T1 in the MI core was higher than in the MI border zone and remote myocardium. However, in the 20 (47%) patients with MVI, MI core T1 was lower than in patients without MVI (MVI 1048±78ms, no MVI 1111±89ms, p=0.02). MI core T2* was significantly lower in patients with MVI than in those without (MVI 20 [18-23]ms, no MVI 31 [26-39]ms, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of MVI profoundly affects MOLLI-measured native T1 values. T2* mapping suggested that this may be the result of intramyocardial haemorrhage. These findings have important implications for the interpretation of native T1 values shortly after AMI. KEY POINTS: • Microvascular injury after acute myocardial infarction affects local T1 and T2* values. • Infarct zone T1 values are lower if microvascular injury is present. • T2* mapping suggests that low infarct T1 values are likely haemorrhage. • T1 and T2* values are complimentary for correctly assessing post-infarct myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robbers et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=43). Presence of microvascular injury (MVI) vs. Absence of microvascular injury was evaluated on Native T1 value in the MI core (ms) (p=0.02). The presence of microvascular injury after acute myocardial infarction significantly lowered native T1 values (1048 vs 1111 ms) and T2 values (20 vs 31 ms) in the infarct core.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: