Key result
Combined therapeutic ventricular assistance and therapeutic apheresis is proposed as a potential treatment strategy to improve outcomes for patients with end-stage heart failure.
Why the study?
Does the combination of therapeutic apheresis and therapeutic ventricular assistance improve outcomes in patients with end-stage heart failure?
Does the combination of therapeutic apheresis and therapeutic ventricular assistance improve outcomes in patients with end-stage heart failure?
The paper proposes a novel conceptual approach combining therapeutic apheresis and ventricular assist devices to promote myocardial recovery in end-stage heart failure.
Should not yet change practice in end-stage HF; leaves open whether combined VAD and apheresis promotes recovery.
Dilated cardiomyopathy is a cardiac disease of unknown origin which is characterized by the gradual development of cardiac failure associated with four-chamber dilatation of the heart. Heart transplantation has been considered as the last resort for this disease. However, some patients who received support with a ventricular assist device (VAD) as a bridge-to-transplantation and then recovered without transplantation have been reported. This new concept of treating heart failure is termed bridge-to-recovery. A VAD can inhibit the heart failure compensatory mechanisms by extreme ventricular unloading. Also, heart failure is a complex neurohormonal/autocrine-paracrine syndrome, and these mechanisms consecutively lead to inflammatory response by proinflammatory cytokines; interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Furthermore, the existence of anti-beta1-adrenoceptor autoantibodies (A-beta1-AABs) in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy has been reported. These proinflammatory cytokines and this antibody accelerate a ventricular remodeling and a contractile dysfunction over the long term. Apheresis can also inhibit the vicious cycle in heart failure by removing the factors that are produced by activated neurohormonal/autocrine-paracrine compensatory mechanisms. Therefore, we propose that the combined therapies, therapeutic VAD and therapeutic apheresis, will provide a prominent outcome for a patient who is suffering from end-stage heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulte-Eistrup et al. (2002) conducted a review in End-stage heart failure / Dilated cardiomyopathy. Combination of therapeutic apheresis and therapeutic ventricular assistance was evaluated. Combined therapeutic ventricular assistance and therapeutic apheresis is proposed as a potential treatment strategy to improve outcomes for patients with end-stage heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: