Key result
A new intracorporeal procedure working continuously as intraaortic balloon counterpulsation is proposed to address the limitations of current destination therapies for end-stage heart failure.
This review discusses the limitations of current destination therapies for end-stage heart failure and proposes a novel intracorporeal counterpulsation procedure.
Should not yet change practice in end-stage HF; leaves open feasibility of continuous intracorporeal counterpulsation as destination therapy.
Encouraging results were obtained by using left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) that exhibits extremely high mortality and who were not candidates for heart transplantation. By using this so-called destination therapy (DT), a substantial percentage of these patients achieved sufficient improvement in cardiac function to permit the explantation of the device. The combination of mechanical and pharmacological therapy increased the frequency and durability of myocardial recovery as compared with other therapeutic approaches. Although cardiac transplantation, LVADs, and cardiac resynchronization therapy have provided a major advance in DT, their limitations stimulate the search for alternative therapies. We discuss the limitations of these 3 treatment options for end-stage HF. Also, we propose and discuss the possible advantages of a new intracorporeal procedure that works continuously as intraaortic balloon counterpulsation without an extracorporeal or intracorporeal computer-controlled mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fantidis et al. (2014) conducted a review in End-stage heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and a proposed new intracorporeal procedure was evaluated. A new intracorporeal procedure working continuously as intraaortic balloon counterpulsation is proposed to address the limitations of current destination therapies for end-stage heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: