Key result
Left ventricular assist devices are viable options for severe heart failure, and this review summarizes recent predictors of poor outcomes to guide optimal patient selection.
Why the study?
What are the predictors of poor outcomes and the optimal patient selection criteria for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy in advanced heart failure?
What are the predictors of poor outcomes and the optimal patient selection criteria for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy in advanced heart failure?
This review provides an overview of patient selection and predictors of poor outcomes for LVAD therapy in the management of end-stage heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid LVAD selection in advanced HF; leaves open prospective validation of predictors.
Heart transplantation (HTx) improves symptoms and prolongs life in advanced heart failure (HF), but organ supply is limited. In recent years, mechanical circulatory support and specifically implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have undergone technical improvements, and outcomes have improved dramatically. Left ventricular assist devices are now viable options for patients with severe HF as bridge to transplantation, destination therapy, or as bridge to recovery. Many believe that LVADs may soon provide outcomes similar to, or better than, HTx, launching a new era of end-stage HF management. The key to improving outcomes is patient selection, but the field is changing rapidly and guidelines and consensus are limited. This review summarizes recent reports of predictors of poor outcomes and provides an overview of selection for LVAD therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lund et al. (2010) conducted a review in Advanced heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) was evaluated. Left ventricular assist devices are viable options for severe heart failure, and this review summarizes recent predictors of poor outcomes to guide optimal patient selection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: