Key result
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology and patient management have evolved, leading to transformative improvements in outcomes for patients with end-stage heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights recent technological and management advancements in LVAD therapy for end-stage heart failure, suggesting potential benefits for earlier intervention.
The number of patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) continues to increase over time, but there has been little change in the availability of organs for cardiac transplantation, intensifying the demand for left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as a bridge to transplantation. There is also a growing number of patients with end-stage HF who are not transplant candidates but may be eligible for long-term support with an LVAD, known as destination therapy. Due to this increasing demand, LVAD technology has evolved, resulting in transformative improvements in outcomes. Additionally, with growing clinical experience patient management continues to be refined, leading to iterative improvements in outcomes. With outcomes continuing to improve, the potential benefit from LVAD therapy is being considered for patients earlier in their course of advanced HF. We review recent changes in technology, patient management, and implant decision making in LVAD therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2018) conducted a review in End-stage heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) was evaluated. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology and patient management have evolved, leading to transformative improvements in outcomes for patients with end-stage heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: