Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A revisionist view that corporate strategy does not matter has gained considerable influence in recent years. This view largely stems from empirical results of early variance decomposition studies that found negligible corporate effects associated with profitability differences between businesses. Our analysis of the variance decomposition literature shows this view to be incorrect. Not only do the studies as a group show that factors at the corporate level of organizations contribute to profitability differences, but also evidence suggests that factors specifically associated with corporate strategy contribute to corporate effects. Corporate strategy in fact does matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowman et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: