Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the difference between cerebral blood flow (CBF) by perfusion computed tomography (CT) and that by xenon-enhanced CT (Xe-CT) through simultaneous measurement. METHODS: Xenon-enhanced CT and perfusion CT were continually performed on 7 normal subjects. Ratios of CBF by perfusion CT (P-CBF) to CBF by Xe-CT (Xe-CBF) were measured for 5 arterial territories; 3 were territories of 3 major arteries (the anterior [ACA], middle [MCA], and posterior [PCA] cerebral arteries), and the other 2 were areas of the thalamus and putamen. RESULTS: The ratios were 1.30 +/- 0.10, 1.26 +/- 0.15, 1.61 +/- 0.15, 0.801 +/- 0.087, and 0.798 +/- 0.080 for the ACA, MCA, PCA, thalamus, and putamen, respectively. Although a good correlation was observed between P-CBF and Xe-CBF for each territory, the ratios were significantly different (P < 0.0001) between 3 territory groups (group 1: ACA and MCA, group 2: PCA, and group 3: thalamus and putamen). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in the ratio of P-CBF to Xe-CBF between the 3 territory groups was considered to result principally from the features of P-CBF. To evaluate P-CBF properly, its territorial characteristics should be taken into account.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sase et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: