Key result
Preprocedural CMR detects 100% of ventricular thrombi before VT ablation, outperforming CT and TTE.
Why the study?
In patients with structural heart disease presenting with VT, detection of ventricular thrombi and subsequent management can be challenging.
Observational (n=154)
CMR is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting ventricular thrombi in patients referred for VT ablation, and deferred ablation after anticoagulation appears safe without embolic complications.
Preprocedural CMR may identify occult thrombi before VT ablation; leaves open whether routine use improves safety in prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: In patients with structural heart disease presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT), detection of ventricular thrombi and subsequent management can be challenging. This study aimed to assess the value of multimodality imaging with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and computed tomography (CT) for thrombus detection as well as a management algorithm geared towards anticoagulation and deferred ablation for patients referred for VT ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 154 consecutive patients referred for VT ablation underwent preprocedural multimodality imaging with CMR, CT, and TTE. In 9 patients (6%) a new ventricular thrombus was detected and anticoagulation was initiated. Thrombi were detected by CMR in nine patients, by CT in seven patients, and by TTE in two patients. Five patients eventually underwent endocardial VT ablation procedures 6.0 ± 2.0 months after initiation of anticoagulation with one patient also requiring an epicardial approach. Two patients died while on anticoagulation, unrelated to ventricular arrhythmia. Four of five patients were rendered non-inducible and no testing was performed in 1/5 patients. Areas containing left ventricular thrombi were non-excitable with pacing. Six of thirty-two inducible VTs were mapped in close vicinity of ventricular thrombi. No clinical embolic events occurred during the ablation procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular thrombus was detected in 6% of consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation. CMR was the most sensitive modality, while contrast-enhanced TTE failed to detect the majority of thrombi. Anticoagulation followed by ablation can be safely and successfully performed in patients with ventricular thrombi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beavers et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia with structural heart disease (n=154). Multimodality imaging (CMR, CT, TTE) and deferred ablation was evaluated on Detection of ventricular thrombus. Preprocedural multimodality imaging detected ventricular thrombi in 6% of patients referred for VT ablation, with CMR detecting all 9 cases compared to 7 by CT and 2 by TTE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: