Key result
FPTI explains ~56% of ablation lesion volume variance, outperforming FTI in an experimental swine model.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether time or force plays a more important role in force-time integral (FTI), and whether FTI or force-power-time index (FPTI) better predicts lesion size.
Does the force-power-time index (FPTI) predict radiofrequency ablation lesion formation better than the force-time integral (FTI) in an experimental swine model?
Does the force-power-time index (FPTI) predict radiofrequency ablation lesion formation better than the force-time integral (FTI) in an experimental swine model?
In an experimental swine model, the force-power-time index (FPTI) is a better predictor of radiofrequency ablation lesion formation than the force-time integral (FTI).
FPTI may refine preclinical ablation lesion metrics; leaves open human cardiac validation before any practice change.
Contact force (CF)-sensing technology has enabled accurate real-time CF measurement in tissue. Average CF, which is quantified by the force–time integral (FTI), correlates with lesion volume. Little is known about which of the time and force factors that compose FTI plays a more important role and which is a better index for predicting lesion size, FTI, or force–power–time index (FPTI). Investigators sought to identify a better index for predicting radiofrequency ablation lesion formation with experimental model. Radiofrequency current was delivered to the swine skeletal muscle at radiofrequency energy current was delivered at 4 fixed power settings (15, 25, 30, and 40 W) for 6 variable time durations (5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 s) with 6 variable CF settings (5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 g). At each setting, the following parameters were evaluated: Between FTI factors, the time factor was more important than the force factor for lesion formation. The area under the curve was greater for FPTI (0.943) than for FTI (0.870). On univariate linear regression analysis, the explanatory power of the linear regression model was better explained by FPTI (56.4%) than FTI (32.1%). Under the same FTI condition, the time factor had a greater effect on lesion formation. When power was included, the power factor had a greater effect on lesion formation and steam pop.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2021) studied Radiofrequency ablation lesion formation (n=336). Force-power-time index (FPTI) vs. Force-time integral (FTI) was evaluated on Explanatory power (R2) for lesion volume (p=<0.01). In an experimental swine skeletal muscle model, the force-power-time index (FPTI) was a better predictor of radiofrequency ablation lesion formation (explanatory power 56.4%) than the force-time integral (32.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: