Key result
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improves 6-minute walk distance by ~94 meters vs sham.
Why the study?
Chronic heart failure is characterized by an autonomic imbalance of vagal and sympathetic activity, and low-level transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation may provide a safe complementary treatment.
Does low-level transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improve 6-minutes walking distance in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
RCT (n=13)
randomized
Does low-level transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improve 6-minutes walking distance in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
Absolute Event Rate: 101.1% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=0.04
In a small pilot study of patients with HFrEF, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation significantly improved 6-minute walking distance compared to sham intervention.
May improve exercise capacity in HFrEF; extends vagal stimulation evidence to noninvasive delivery in a pilot RCT.
INTRODUCTION AND AIM OF STUDY: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is characterized by an autonomic imbalance of vagal activity and increased sympathetic activity. Low-level transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (Ta-VNS) may be a safe complementary treatment option for CHF patients. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, a total of 13 patients with diagnosed CHF and reduced ejection fraction were randomized to receive either low-level Ta-VNS with electrodes applied in the triangular fossa of the ear (amplitude 1 mA, frequency 1 Hz for 40 min, followed by a 20-minute break) or sham intervention. The primary endpoint was an increase of 6-minutes walking distance assessed during cardiological screening and closing visits. Secondary endpoints included assessment of New York heart association (NYHA)-classification, a physical examination, electrocardiogram and blood sampling for n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)and C-reactive protein (CRP). Echocardiogram was performed at screening and adverse events were assessed at the closing visit. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients completed the trial. 6-minute-walking-distance increased by 101.1 (94.6) metres in the transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation group, and by 7.2 (41.8) metres in the sham intervention group (p = 0.04). Concerning the secondary outcome parameters, including CRP and NT-proBNP, no difference was observed between groups. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with CHF, Ta-VNS effectively improved 6-minutes walking distance while no such effect was observed in the sham intervention group. Further investigation of this finding in a larger patient collective might be of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schukro et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=13). Low-level transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (Ta-VNS) vs. Sham intervention was evaluated on Increase of 6-minutes walking distance (p=0.04). Low-level transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation significantly increased 6-minute walking distance by 101.1 metres compared to 7.2 metres with sham intervention (p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: