Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current conceptualizations of the construct of “communication competence” are examined and found to be problematic. It is argued that “communication competence” must be distinguished from “communication performance.” Neither is seen as a reliable predictor of the other. It is suggested that both research and pedagogy must make clear distinctions among cognitive, affective, and psychomotor elements if they are to lead to improvements in either competence or performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James C. McCroskey (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: