Key result
DAPA-MI tests whether dapagliflozin improves cardiometabolic outcomes versus placebo in post-MI patients without diabetes.
Why the study?
Therapies to further prevent heart failure and other cardiovascular and metabolic events in patients with recent myocardial infarction remain an unmet medical need.
Does dapagliflozin improve a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, and cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with acute MI and impaired LV function without diabetes or established heart failure?
RCT (n=4,017)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does dapagliflozin improve a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, and cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with acute MI and impaired LV function without diabetes or established heart failure?
The DAPA-MI trial is designed to evaluate whether dapagliflozin improves cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with acute MI and impaired LV function who do not have diabetes or established heart failure.
Addresses evidence gap for SGLT2i post-MI without diabetes; extends evaluation of cardiometabolic benefits to this population.
BACKGROUND: Therapies that could further prevent the development of heart failure (HF) and other cardiovascular and metabolic events in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) represent a large and unmet medical need. METHODS: DAPA-MI is a multicenter, parallel-group, registry-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in patients without known diabetes or established HF, presenting with MI and impaired left ventricular systolic function or Q-wave MI. The trial evaluated the effect of dapagliflozin 10 mg vs placebo, given once daily in addition to standard of care therapy, on death, hospitalization for HF (HHF), and other cardiometabolic outcomes. The primary objective of the trial was to determine, using the win-ratio method, if dapagliflozin is superior to placebo by comparing the hierarchical composite outcome of death, HHF, nonfatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter, new onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus, HF symptoms as measured by New York Heart Association Functional Classification at last visit, and body weight decrease ≥5% at last visit. Assuming a true win-ratio of 1.20 between dapagliflozin and placebo, 4,000 patients provide a statistical power of 80% for the test of the primary composite outcome. A registry-based randomized controlled trial framework allowed for recruitment, randomization, blinding, and pragmatic data collection of baseline demographics, medications, and clinical outcomes using existing national clinical registries (in Sweden and the UK) integrated with the trial database. CONCLUSIONS: The trial explores opportunities to improve further the outcome of patients with impaired LV function after MI. The innovative trial design of DAPA-MI, incorporating national clinical registry data, has facilitated efficient patient recruitment as well as outcome ascertainment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04564742.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction without diabetes mellitus (n=4,017). Dapagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Hierarchical composite outcome of death, hospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter, new onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus, NYHA Functional Classification at last visit, and body weight decrease ≥5% at last visit. The DAPA-MI trial is designed to evaluate whether dapagliflozin 10 mg daily improves a hierarchical composite of cardiometabolic outcomes compared to placebo in patients with acute myocardial infarction without diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: