Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The idea of path-dependency is applied to an examination of health policy reform in Germany, France, Great Britain and the United States. In the path-dependent model, actors are hemmed in by existing institutions and structures that channel them along established policy paths. Therefore, in any system, big (non-incremental) change is unlikely. However, sometimes we do observe big change. Why? By developing the interplay of structure with conjuncture, the occasional accomplishment of big change - in spite of path dependency - can be systematically understood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Wilsford (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: