Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper we discuss how rights‐based moral theories can increase our understanding of siting controversies. It is argued that the notion of residual obligations can be used to overcome, at least in part, the conflict between the individual right not to be exposed to involuntary risks arising from e.g. the establishment of a new industry, and the rights of industries and other large organizations to build plants that are associated with risks for people living nearby. Use is made of a typology of residual obligations according to which the types are obligations to compensate, to communicate, to improve, to search for knowledge, and to have an appropriate attitude. Each of these types of residual obligations can be shown to be relevant in siting controversies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: