Key result
Epicardial biventricular pacing improved LV systolic mechanics (Ees 20.0 vs 12.8 mmHg/cc) and shortened QRS duration compared to single-site pacing in a canine model of AV block (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does epicardial biventricular pacing improve LV systolic mechanics and shorten QRS duration compared to single-site ventricular pacing in an acute canine model of AV block?
Does epicardial biventricular pacing improve LV systolic mechanics and shorten QRS duration compared to single-site ventricular pacing in an acute canine model of AV block?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Epicardial biventricular pacing acutely improves left ventricular systolic performance and electrical synchrony compared to single-site right ventricular pacing in a canine model of AV block.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate epicardial biventricular pacing as a means of maintaining synchronous ventricular activation in an acute canine model of AV block with normal ventricular anatomy and function. Chronic single-site ventricular pacing results in dyssynchronous ventricular activation and may contribute to ventricular dysfunction. Biventricular pacing has been used successfully in adult patients with congestive heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an acute study of open chest mongrel dogs (n = 13). ECG, left ventricular (LV), aortic, and pulmonary arterial pressures were measured. LV impedance catheters were used to assess cardiodynamics using instantaneous LV pressure-volume relations (PVR). Following radiofrequency ablation of the AV node, a temporary pacemaker was programmed 10 beats/min above the intrinsic atrial rate, with an AV interval similar to the baseline intrinsic PR interval. The pacing protocol consisted of 5-minute intervals with the following lead configurations: right atrium-right ventricular apex (RA-RVA), RA-LV apex (LVA), and RA-biventricular using combinations of four ventricular sites (RVA, RV outflow tract [RVOT], LVA, LV base [LVB]). RA-RVA was used as the experimental control. LV systolic mechanics, as measured by the slope of the end-systolic (Ees) PVR (ESPVR, mmHg/cc), was statistically greater (P < 0.05) with all modes of biventricular pacing (RA-RVA/LVA 20.0 +/- 2.9, RA-RVA/LVB 18.4 +/- 2.9, RA-RVOT/LVA 15.1 +/- 1.8, RA-RVOT/LVB 17.6 +/- 2.9) compared to single-site ventricular pacing (RA-RVA 12.8 +/- 1.6). Concurrent with this improvement in myocardial performance was a shortening of the QRS duration (RA-RVA 97.7 +/- 2.9 vs RA-RVA/LVA 75.7 +/- 4.9, RA-RVA/LVB 70.3 +/- 4.9, RA-RVOT/LVA 65.3 +/- 4.4, and RA-RVOT/LVB 76.7 +/- 5.9, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this acute canine model of AV block, QRS duration shortened and LV performance improved with epicardial biventricular pacing compared to standard single-site ventricular pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frías et al. (2003) studied Atrioventricular block (n=13). Epicardial biventricular pacing vs. Single-site ventricular pacing (RA-RVA) was evaluated on LV systolic mechanics (slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation) (p=<0.05). Epicardial biventricular pacing improved LV systolic mechanics (Ees 20.0 vs 12.8 mmHg/cc) and shortened QRS duration compared to single-site pacing in a canine model of AV block (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: