PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 21, 2016Journal of Nuclear Medicine72 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic Performance of Attenuation-Corrected Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
JHJei-Yie HuangCHChun‐Kai HuangRYRuoh‐Fang Yen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT is a well-established tool for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, soft-tissue attenuation is a common artifact that limits the diagnostic accuracy of MPI. The aim of this study was to determine whether attenuation correction (AC) improved the diagnostic performance of MPI, using coronary angiography as a reference standard. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until March 2015 for studies evaluating AC MPI for the diagnosis of CAD. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of AC versus non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) MPI. A bivariate mixed-effects model was applied for pooling the data. RESULTS: Of 201 articles, 17 studies (1,701 patients) were identified, including 5 studies that used CT AC, 12 studies that used radionuclide source AC (RAC), and 15 studies that reported NAC results. The pooled sensitivities across studies were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.85) for CT AC, RAC, all AC, and NAC, respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85), and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74). Both sensitivities and specificities resulted in a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 20 (95% CI, 12-34), 24 (95% CI, 13-43), 22 (95% CI, 13-35), and 9 (7-11). Significant differences in specificity and diagnostic odds ratios were noted when AC (including CT AC, RAC, and all AC) was compared with NAC. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggested that AC should be applied to MPI to improve the diagnosis of CAD, especially the specificity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a130df706ed52b5c2c0fecehttps://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.171462
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimation of the ROC Curve under Verification Bias2009 · 39 citations
  2. 2A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations2001 · 1,541 citations
  3. 3Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of diagnostic performance2007 · 207 citations
  4. 4Assessing the Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Perfusion Studies: Identification of Patients at Risk vs Patients who May Benefit from Intervention?2014 · 6 citations
  5. 5Simultaneous Transmission/Emission Myocardial Perfusion Tomography1996 · 315 citations