Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores how policy learning can improve comparative policy analysis by focusing on causality in learning processes. After summarizing the comparative credentials of the policy learning literature, the article outlines a framework of four learning modes, relating it to three approaches of causality: deterministic, probabilistic, and set-theoretic. It then builds on this to explore different approaches to causation and learning in relation to: policy change, political contexts, and, finally, the temporal and spatial dimensions of comparative policy analysis. The article concludes by showing how these challenges are addressed and suggesting implications for further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dunlop et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: