This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A nationwide Swedish case-control study of 388 men and 63 women with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal function and 676 men controls and 140 women investigated whether sex differences in aetiology contribute to male predominance. Compared with men, women seemed more vulnerable to reflux (odds ratio (OR)=4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.0-10.5 vs OR=3.4, 95% CI=2.5-4.6), obesity (OR=10.3, 95% CI=2.6-42.3 vs OR=5.4, 95% CI=2.6-10.8) and smoking (OR=5.3, 95% CI=2.0-14.1 vs OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.9-4.2), less harmed by low intake of fruit and vegetables (OR=0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.4 vs OR=1.6, 95% CI=1.1-2.2) and less protected by Helicobacter pylori infection (OR=0.5, 95% CI=0.3-0.8 vs OR=1.6, 95% CI=0.5-5.4).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Löfdahl et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: