Key result
Accurate discrimination of AVNRT from VT with 1:1 retrograde conduction in ICDs requires careful programming of the post-ventricular atrial blanking period to allow precise V-A interval determination.
Why the study?
How can ICDs discriminate supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 A:V relationship from ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 retrograde conduction?
How can ICDs discriminate supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 A:V relationship from ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 retrograde conduction?
V-A time, electrogram morphology, and response to antitachycardia pacing are useful mechanisms for discriminating SVT from VT in patients with ICDs.
Careful PVAB programming may aid AVNRT-VT discrimination in ICDs; leaves open prospective validation before algorithm changes.
Inappropriate ICD shocks are associated with increased mortality. They also impair patients' quality of life, increase hospitalizations, and raise health-care costs. Nearly 80% of inappropriate ICD shocks are caused by supraventricular tachycardia. Here we report the case of a patient who received a single-lead dual-chamber sensing ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death and experienced inappropriate ICD shocks. V-A time, electrogram morphology, and response to antitachycardia pacing suggested atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, which was confirmed in an electrophysiology study. Inspired by this case, we performed a literature review to discuss mechanisms for discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 A:V relationship from ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 retrograde conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardoso et al. (2015) conducted a review in Inappropriate ICD shocks due to supraventricular tachycardia (n=1). Single-lead dual-chamber sensing ICD was evaluated. Accurate discrimination of AVNRT from VT with 1:1 retrograde conduction in ICDs requires careful programming of the post-ventricular atrial blanking period to allow precise V-A interval determination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: