Key result
The single-chamber Rhythm ID algorithm detected 100% of ventricular arrhythmias and successfully discriminated supraventricular tachycardia with a specificity of 91%.
Why the study?
Does the single-chamber Rhythm ID algorithm accurately discriminate supraventricular tachycardia from ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ICDs?
Observational (n=96)
Yes
Does the single-chamber Rhythm ID algorithm accurately discriminate supraventricular tachycardia from ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ICDs?
The single-chamber Rhythm ID algorithm demonstrates high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%) for discriminating ventricular arrhythmias from supraventricular tachycardia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports single-chamber Rhythm ID for arrhythmia discrimination in ICDs; leaves open randomized validation versus dual-chamber algorithms.
AIMS: Interval- and morphology-based algorithms have been used in modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) to discriminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from other rhythms. A newly developed ICD discrimination algorithm, Rhythm ID (Guidant Corporation, St Paul, MN, USA), uses both interval-based metrics and an electrogram vector timing and correlation (VTC) algorithm in a dual-chamber ICD. In a single-chamber ICD, Rhythm ID contains only the VTC component. This study conducted a retrospective analysis of the performance of Rhythm ID for the detection of induced and spontaneous rhythms in a single-chamber ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study gathered the data from a prospective, multicentre clinical trial. Ninety-six patients were implanted with a dual-chamber ICD. For this study, each episode was analysed to determine the performance of the single-chamber ICD Rhythm ID algorithm. The mean age of the patients implanted with the device was 67+/-11 years. Seventy-eight patients were male. The primary cardiovascular disease was coronary artery disease and the primary tachyarrhythmia was monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). The mean follow-up time was 11.4 months. A total of 369 induced and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias was analysed. The algorithm detected 100% of ventricular arrhythmias. Four hundred and forty-two SVT episodes were analysed, including 145 induced and 297 spontaneous. The SVTs were atrial fibrillation (n=199), atrial flutter (n=135), and 1:1 SVT (n=108). The single-chamber ICD Rhythm ID algorithm successfully discriminated 403 SVT episodes and achieved a specificity of 91%. CONCLUSION: The single-chamber version of Rhythm ID demonstrated high specificity without compromising sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corbisiero et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n=96). Single-chamber ICD Rhythm ID algorithm (vector timing and correlation) was evaluated on Detection of induced and spontaneous rhythms (sensitivity for ventricular arrhythmias and specificity for SVT). The single-chamber Rhythm ID algorithm detected 100% of ventricular arrhythmias and successfully discriminated supraventricular tachycardia with a specificity of 91%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: