Key result
CT-guided RA-to-LV ablation access reduces VT episodes ~99% in a dual mechanical valve patient.
Why the study?
Traditional approaches to access the LV for endocardial catheter ablation of VT are not feasible in patients with simultaneous mitral and aortic mechanical valve replacements.
Does preprocedure imaging registered to a mapping system help guide right atrium-to-left ventricle access for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with simultaneous mitral and aortic mechanical valves?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does preprocedure imaging registered to a mapping system help guide right atrium-to-left ventricle access for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with simultaneous mitral and aortic mechanical valves?
Preprocedure imaging registered to a mapping system can successfully guide right atrium-to-left ventricle access for VT ablation in patients with dual mechanical valves.
Supports feasibility of CT-guided RA-LV access for VT ablation in dual mechanical valves; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Traditional approaches to access the left ventricle (LV) for endocardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) are not feasible in patients with simultaneous mitral and aortic mechanical valve replacements. Recent data1 have shown that access directly from the right atrium (RA) through the inferior septal process of the LV, site of a so-called Gerbode defect, can be safely performed. In this report, preprocedure imaging was used to plan the optimal site of access and registered to the mapping system to help guide the procedure in real time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shim et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Ventricular tachycardia (n=1). Preprocedure cardiac CT imaging for planning right atrium-to-left ventricle access was evaluated. Preprocedure cardiac CT imaging successfully guided right atrium-to-left ventricle access for catheter ablation in a patient with dual mechanical valves, reducing VT episodes from 105 to 1.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: