Key result
Epicardial mapping and ablation via a percutaneous subxiphoid technique is an essential adjunctive strategy for treating complex ventricular tachycardia when endocardial ablation alone is insufficient.
Why the study?
Does adjunctive epicardial ablation reduce recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiomyopathy compared to endocardial ablation alone?
Population
Patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia and complex myocardial scars due to ischemic cardiomyopathy…
Comparison
Epicardial mapping and ablation via a… vs Endocardial ablation alone.
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support epicardial access in refractory VT after failed endocardial ablation; leaves open need for randomized trials to confirm benefit.
Does adjunctive epicardial ablation reduce recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiomyopathy compared to endocardial ablation alone?
Epicardial ablation is an essential adjunctive strategy for treating recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with complex myocardial scars when endocardial ablation alone is insufficient.
Tung et al. (2015) conducted a review in Ventricular Tachycardia. Epicardial mapping and ablation vs. Endocardial ablation alone was evaluated. Epicardial mapping and ablation via a percutaneous subxiphoid technique is an essential adjunctive strategy for treating complex ventricular tachycardia when endocardial ablation alone is insufficient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: