Key result
DOACs linked to ~44% slower eGFR decline versus warfarin in Asian AF patients.
Why the study?
The study was designed to compare the risk of eGFR decline between AF patients receiving DOACs versus warfarin.
Do DOACs reduce eGFR decline compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=1,708)
Yes
Do DOACs reduce eGFR decline compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In Asian patients with nonvalvular AF, DOAC use is associated with a slower rate of renal function decline compared to warfarin, regardless of warfarin anticoagulation control quality.
DOACs were associated with slower eGFR decline versus warfarin in Asian nonvalvular AF; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
Background The objective of this study was to compare the risk of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline between atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin. Methods We studied patients with nonvalvular AF from a prospective multicenter national AF registry in Thailand. Patients with missing eGFR data or eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 were excluded. Follow‐up data including eGFR were collected every 6 months until 3 years. eGFR decline was assessed by eGFR slope. We compared eGFR slope between patients who received DOACs and warfarin at baseline. In the warfarin group, we assessed the impact of good anticoagulation control by time in the therapeutic range (TTR). Results A total of 1708 patients were studied (mean age 68.1 years; 42.6% female). Patients with DOACs had a significantly slower rate of eGFR decline compared to warfarin. The eGFR slope was 2.32 mL/min/1.73 m 2 per year in the warfarin group (95% CI: 3.09 to 1.55), and 1.31 mL/min/1.73 m 2 per year in the DOAC group (95% CI: 1.97 to 0.64). The effect of OAC type on the eGFR slope remained significant even after the adjustment of baseline variables including baseline eGFR. There was no difference in GFR decline as reflected by eGFR slope when comparing warfarin patients with TTR <65% and ≥65%. Conclusion In this prospective cohort of Asian patients with AF, DOACs were associated with a slower rate of eGFR decline when compared with warfarin. In the latter group, this was irrespective of the quality of anticoagulation control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krittayaphong et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=1,708). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on eGFR decline assessed by eGFR slope (mL/min/1.73 m2 per year). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a significantly slower rate of eGFR decline compared to warfarin (1.31 vs 2.32 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year) in Asian patients with nonvalvular AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Atrial fibrillationMore from Journal of Arrhythmia