Key result
Stroke associated with atrial fibrillation was associated with a 2-fold increase in costs in patients with mild-moderate stroke (P<0.001) and higher total costs per patient overall (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Are direct and indirect costs higher in patients with stroke associated with atrial fibrillation compared to non-AF-stroke?
Cohort (n=568)
Are direct and indirect costs higher in patients with stroke associated with atrial fibrillation compared to non-AF-stroke?
AF stroke may warrant cost considerations in care planning; hypothesis-generating for prevention's economic impact.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No economic data from population-based studies exist on acute or late hospital, community, and indirect costs of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation (AF-stroke). Such data are essential for policy development, service planning, and cost-effectiveness analysis of new therapeutic agents. METHODS: In a population-based prospective study of incident and recurrent stroke treated in hospital and community settings, we investigated direct (healthcare related) and indirect costs for a 2-year period. Survival, disability, poststroke residence, and healthcare use were determined at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. Acute hospital cost was determined using a case-mix approach, and other costs using a bottom-up approach (2007 prices). RESULTS: In 568 patients ascertained in 1 year (2006), the total estimated 2-year cost was $33.84 million. In the overall sample, AF-stroke accounted for 31% (177) of patients, but a higher proportion of costs (40.5% of total and 45% of nursing home costs). On a per-patient basis compared with non-AF-stroke, AF-stroke was associated with higher total (P<0.001) and acute hospital costs (P<0.001), and greater nursing home (P=0.001) and general practitioner (P<0.001) costs among 90-day survivors. After stratification by stroke severity in survivors, AF was associated with 2-fold increase in costs in patients with mild-moderate (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 0-15) stroke (P<0.001) but not in severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥16; P=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: In our population study, AF-stroke was associated with substantially higher total, acute hospital, nursing home, and general practitioner costs per patient. Targeted programs to identify AF and prevent AF-stroke may have significant economic benefits, in addition to health benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannon et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Stroke (n=568). Atrial fibrillation (AF-stroke) vs. Non-AF-stroke was evaluated on Total and acute hospital costs per patient (p=<0.001). Stroke associated with atrial fibrillation was associated with a 2-fold increase in costs in patients with mild-moderate stroke (P<0.001) and higher total costs per patient overall (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: