Key result
Onset of chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was associated with a 200% increase in total direct healthcare costs from $412 pre-AF to $1235 per member per month post-AF.
Why the study?
Does warfarin utilization reduce total direct healthcare costs in patients with incident chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Population
3,891 continuously benefit-eligible patients with incident chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation ≥45 years…
Comparison
Warfarin utilization vs No warfarin exposure and pre-AF onset period
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
at least 6 months
Authors
Loading...
Incident AF triples direct costs; leaves open whether anticoagulation offsets this in observational cohorts.
Cohort (n=3,891)
Yes
Does warfarin utilization reduce total direct healthcare costs in patients with incident chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: 200% increase
Absolute Event Rate: 1235% vs 412%
Incident chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation significantly increases direct healthcare costs, while warfarin utilization is associated with a reduction in these costs.
Boccuzzi et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=3,891). Onset of chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation vs. Pre-AF onset period was evaluated on Total direct healthcare costs per member per month (pmpm) (200% increase). Onset of chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was associated with a 200% increase in total direct healthcare costs from $412 pre-AF to $1235 per member per month post-AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: