Key result
Nonselective HBP is linked to ~73 ms shorter peak lateral wall activation time in LBBB.
Why the study?
Whether nonselective His bundle pacing corrects delayed myocardial activation in patients with left bundle branch block and left-axis deviation had not been analyzed.
Does nonselective His bundle pacing improve myocardial activation times and QRS parameters in patients with left-axis deviation or left bundle branch block?
Observational (n=57)
No
Does nonselective His bundle pacing improve myocardial activation times and QRS parameters in patients with left-axis deviation or left bundle branch block?
Absolute Event Rate: 119% vs 188%
p-value: p=<0.00001
Nonselective His bundle pacing improves left ventricular activation by normalizing the QRS axis, shortening activation times, and increasing lead 1 voltage in patients with left-axis deviation and left bundle branch block.
NS-HBP may improve LV activation in LBBB; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
It has been suggested that nonselective His bundle pacing (NS-HBP) corrects terminal conduction delay in right bundle branch block by early excitation of the right ventricular free wall. A similar analysis of NS-HBP, in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left-axis deviation (LAD) has not been done. Therefore, we compared the baseline QRS parameters in LAD and LBBB during NS-HBP and selective HBP (S-HBP). In LAD patients (n = 16), NS-HBP normalized the QRS axis from -35° ± 10° to 30° ± 34° (p < 0.01) and increased the lead 1 voltage (L1V) from 0.55 ± 0.3 mV to 0.88 ± 0.2 mV (p < 0.001) without increasing the peak lateral wall activation time (PLWAT) (p = not significant). In 23 of 41 LBBB patients, NS-HBP decreased the prolonged PLWAT by 73 ms (p < 0.0001), resolved the mid-QRS notch, normalized the QRS axis, and increased the L1V from 0.5 ± 0.3 mV to 1.15 ± 0.3 mV (p < 0.0001). In the remaining 18 LBBB patients, NS-HBP did not resolve the mid-QRS notch; however, the peak septal activation time decreased by 45 ms (p < 0.0001), PLWAT decreased by 53 ms (p < 0.0001), L1V increased from 0.5 ± 0.3 mV to 0.87 ± 0.4 mV (p < 0.0001), and the QRS axis normalized. All patients who developed S-HBP at lower pacing showed uncorrected LBBB (n = 6) or LAD (n = 7). In conclusion, NS-HBP, which causes myocardial activation in advance of simultaneously initiated S-HBP, results in a paced QRS complex with a normal axis and shorter activation times and restores the L1V in patients with LAD and LBBB. In some patients, a mid-QRS notch was seen with NS-HBP, which suggests fusion with S-HBP, which conducts without LBBB correction. A higher L1V in association with a shorter PLWAT and a normal QRS axis suggests that a more organized degree of left ventricular activation occurs with NS-HBP as compared to LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmud et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Left-axis deviation (LAD) and Left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=57). Nonselective His bundle pacing (NS-HBP) vs. Baseline native conduction was evaluated on Peak lateral wall activation time (PLWAT) in LBBB patients without a notched complex (p=<0.00001). Nonselective His bundle pacing significantly decreased peak lateral wall activation time by 73 ms and normalized the QRS axis in patients with left bundle branch block compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: