Key result
High-voltage non-selective His bundle pacing corrects RBBB in ~63% of patients versus selective pacing.
Why the study?
Although correction of RBBB during non-selective His bundle pacing has been reported, its mechanism remains unknown.
Does non-selective His bundle pacing correct right bundle branch block located distal to the site of pacing in patients with RBBB?
Observational (n=39)
Does non-selective His bundle pacing correct right bundle branch block located distal to the site of pacing in patients with RBBB?
Non-selective His bundle pacing can correct right bundle branch block distal to the pacing site, likely via a voltage-dependent parallel pathway.
Higher-voltage non-selective His bundle pacing may correct distal RBBB; observational data leaves open its clinical role pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that bundle branch block (BBB) may be corrected simply by selective His bundle pacing (S-HBP) distal to site of block. However, clinical HBP is often non-selective (NS), the site of block unknown and moving the HB lead is not always an option. Thus, while correction of right (R) BBB in NS-HBP has been reported, its mechanism is unknown. METHODS: Threshold testing was done during His bundle pacing in 39 patients with RBBB. We compared NS-HBP and S-HBP and analyzed the role of pacing voltage and capture threshold of the parallel pathway, in partially or completely correcting RBBB. RESULTS: During NS-HBP, higher pacing voltage completely corrected RBBB in 22/35 patients as compared to 5/18 patients at lower voltage. Remaining patients showed incomplete correction of RBBB. NS-HBP group with lower capture threshold of 1.3 ± 0.5 V completely resolved RBBB in 9/14 vs 3/11 patients in NS-S HBP group with higher capture threshold of 2.4 ± 0.8 V. QRS activation time in NSHBP was 91 ± 8 ms (baseline 97 ± 7 ms p = ns). S-HBP resolved RBBB in only 1/21 patients. CONCLUSIONS: 1.) Lack of correction with S-HBP suggests that RBBB was distal to site of HBP and yet was corrected with NS-HBP. 2.) Voltage dependent correction of RBBB in NS-HBP suggests that conduction via a specialized parallel pathway maintains normal ventricular activation time. 3.) Correction of RBBB in all patients with NS-HBP, suggests that conduction block was either bypassed or right ventricular free wall pre-excited by conduction via parallel pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmud et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Right bundle branch block (RBBB) (n=39). Non-selective His bundle pacing (NS-HBP) vs. Selective His bundle pacing (S-HBP) and lower voltage pacing was evaluated on Complete correction of RBBB. Non-selective His bundle pacing at higher voltages completely corrected right bundle branch block in 22 of 35 patients, whereas selective His bundle pacing resolved it in only 1 of 21 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: