PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2018Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology175 citations

Permanent His Bundle Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Right Bundle Branch Block

View Full Paper
PSParikshit S. SharmaCleveland Clinic FloridaANAngela NaperkowskiValley HospitalTBTerry D. BauchGeisinger Health System

Key Result

Permanent His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure and RBBB significantly narrowed QRS duration from 158 to 127 ms (P=0.0001) and increased LV ejection fraction from 31% to 39% (P=0.004).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=39)

Structured PICO

Does permanent His bundle pacing improve QRS duration, LVEF, and NYHA class in patients with heart failure, reduced LVEF, and RBBB?

P
Population
39 patients with reduced LV ejection fraction, right bundle branch block (RBBB), QRS duration ≥120 ms, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure. Mean age 72±10 years, 15% female.
I
Intervention
Permanent His bundle pacing (HBP) as a primary or rescue (failed LV lead implant) strategy
O
Outcome
Feasibility (implant success) and outcomes including QRS duration, LV ejection fraction, and NYHA functional class in follow-upsurrogate

Permanent His bundle pacing is a feasible and effective option for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure, reduced LVEF, and RBBB, leading to improved QRS duration, LVEF, and NYHA class.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.0001

Abstract

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilizing biventricular pacing is an effective therapy for patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, left bundle branch block, and heart failure. Benefits of biventricular pacing may be limited in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Permanent His bundle pacing (HBP) has recently been reported as an option for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of HBP in patients with RBBB and heart failure. Methods HBP was attempted as a primary or rescue (failed LV lead implant) strategy in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction, RBBB, QRS duration ≥120 ms, and New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure. Implant characteristics, New York Heart Association functional class, and echocardiographic data were assessed in follow-up. Results Mean age was 72±10 years, female 15%, with an average LV ejection fraction of 31±10%. HBP was successful in 37 of 39 patients (95%) with narrowing of RBBB in 78% cases. His capture and bundle branch block correction thresholds were 1.1±0.6 V and 1.4±0.7 V at 1 ms, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 15±23 months, there was a significant narrowing of QRS from 158±24 to 127±17 ms ( P=0.0001), increase in LV ejection fraction from 31±10% to 39±13% ( P=0.004), and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class from 2.8±0.6 to 2±0.7 ( P=0.0001) with HBP. Increase in capture threshold occurred in 3 patients. Conclusions Permanent HBP was associated with significant narrowing of QRS duration and improvement in LV function in patients with RBBB and reduced LV ejection fraction. Permanent HBP is a promising option for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with RBBB and reduced LV ejection fraction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heart failure and right bundle branch block (n=39). Permanent His bundle pacing was evaluated on QRS duration, LV ejection fraction, and NYHA functional class (p=0.0001). Permanent His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure and RBBB significantly narrowed QRS duration from 158 to 127 ms (P=0.0001) and increased LV ejection fraction from 31% to 39% (P=0.004).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0871fddf3db87398109599https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.118.006613
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience2017 · 410 citations
  2. 2Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure2010 · 1,870 citations
  3. 3PR Interval Identifies Clinical Response in Patients With Non–Left Bundle Branch Block2014 · 113 citations
  4. 4Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure2002 · 4,609 citations
  5. 5The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure2005 · 6,309 citations