Key result
His bundle pacing matches biventricular pacing in echocardiographic and functional improvements for CRT.
Why the study?
His bundle pacing has emerged as a novel method for electrical resynchronization in bundle branch block and an alternative to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Does His bundle pacing improve echocardiographic and functional outcomes compared to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients eligible for CRT?
Does His bundle pacing improve echocardiographic and functional outcomes compared to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients eligible for CRT?
His bundle pacing is emerging as a viable alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy, particularly as a bailout strategy when traditional BiV is unachievable or ineffective.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support His bundle pacing as bailout in CRT failures; leaves open equivalence in randomized trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: His bundle pacing (HBP) has emerged as a novel method to achieve electrical resynchronization in bundle branch block and as an alternative means to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). There are now data on HBP in CRT-eligible patients from cohort studies and a single pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). RECENT FINDINGS: Early clinical data regarding HBP in heart failure have demonstrated echocardiographic and functional improvement similar to traditional biventricular pacing (BiV), mostly when utilized as a bailout to traditional BiV-CRT. A single pilot RCT, His-SYNC, showed a trend toward greater echocardiographic response in an on-treatment analysis, but was underpowered. No large RCTs have reported long-term clinical outcomes. In order to realize any benefit from HBP, output-dependent morphology changes must be demonstrated to ensure the conduction system capture is present. There may be a role for corrective HBP in patients with right bundle branch block and after atrioventricular node ablation, which is theoretically more desirable than traditional BiV. Importantly, however, HBP is likely not to benefit patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. SUMMARY: HBP is emerging as an alternative strategy for CRT and may have a role in patients in whom traditional BiV is not achievable or ineffective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Upadhyay et al. (2020) conducted a review in Heart failure. His bundle pacing (HBP) vs. Biventricular pacing (BiV) was evaluated. His bundle pacing is emerging as an alternative strategy for cardiac resynchronization therapy, demonstrating echocardiographic and functional improvement similar to traditional biventricular pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: