Key result
His bundle pacing offers a promising alternative to RVP and BiV pacing by promoting synchronicity.
Why the study?
Right ventricular apical pacing induces dyssynchronous ventricular activation promoting heart failure and atrial fibrillation, prompting interest in His bundle pacing as a physiological alternative.
Does His bundle pacing provide better physiological electro-mechanical activation compared to right ventricular apical pacing or biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia or heart failure?
Does His bundle pacing provide better physiological electro-mechanical activation compared to right ventricular apical pacing or biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia or heart failure?
His bundle pacing is a promising physiological alternative to right ventricular apical pacing and biventricular pacing, though large randomized trials are needed.
May warrant consideration in bradycardia or HF; leaves open superiority confirmation in large RCTs.
Since its introduction right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been the mainstay in cardiac pacing. However, in recent years there has been an upsurge of interest in permanent His bundle pacing (HBP), given the scientific evidence of the harmful role of dyssynchronous ventricular activation, induced by RVA pacing, in promoting the onset of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. After an intermediate period in which attention was focused on algorithms aimed at minimizing ventricular pacing, with partially inadequate and harmful results, scientific attention shifted to HBP, which proved to ensure a physiological electro-mechanical activation of the ventricles. The encouraging results obtained have allowed the introduction of HBP in recent guidelines for cardiac pacing in patients with bradicardia and cardiac conduction delay. Recent studies have also demonstrated the potential of HBP in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. HBP is promising as an attractive way to achieve physiological stimulation in patients with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Comparative studies of HB-CRT and biventricular pacing have shown similar results in numerically modest cohorts, although HB-CRT has been shown to promote better ventricular electrical resynchronization as demonstrated by a greater QRS narrowing. A widespread use of this pacing tecnique also depends on improvements in technology, as well as further validation of effectiveness in large randomised clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vetta et al. (2020) conducted a review in Bradycardia, cardiac conduction delay, and heart failure. His bundle pacing (HBP) vs. Right ventricular apical pacing and biventricular pacing was evaluated. His bundle pacing provides a physiological model of ventricular activation that promotes synchronicity, serving as a promising alternative to right ventricular apical and biventricular pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: