Key result
Intravascular imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography have the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional angiography and optimize clinical outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
Do catheter-based intravascular imaging techniques optimize clinical outcomes compared to angiography during percutaneous coronary intervention?
Do catheter-based intravascular imaging techniques optimize clinical outcomes compared to angiography during percutaneous coronary intervention?
This review highlights the potential of intravascular imaging techniques like IVUS and OCT to improve upon angiography and optimize outcomes in PCI.
Does not support routine intravascular imaging in PCI; leaves open need for definitive randomized outcome trials.
Angiography is the current gold standard for imaging during percutaneous coronary interventions but has significant limitations. Catheter-based intravascular imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and the more recent optical coherence tomography have the potential to overcome these limitations and thus optimize clinical outcomes. In this update, we discussed the current applications of the available imaging techniques, existing evidence, continuing unmet needs, and potential areas for further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehrotra et al. (2018) conducted a review in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intravascular imaging (IVUS and OCT) vs. Conventional angiography was evaluated. Intravascular imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography have the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional angiography and optimize clinical outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: