Key result
Incremental pacing identified complete cavotricuspid isthmus block, which was associated with significantly fewer atrial flutter recurrences compared to persistent conduction (2.2% vs 33.3%, P=0.01).
Why the study?
Does incremental atrial pacing to diagnose and achieve complete cavotricuspid isthmus block reduce atrial flutter recurrences in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation?
Observational (n=52)
Does incremental atrial pacing to diagnose and achieve complete cavotricuspid isthmus block reduce atrial flutter recurrences in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation?
Incremental rapid pacing is an effective method to distinguish complete cavotricuspid isthmus block from slow conduction, and achieving complete block confirmed by this method significantly reduces atrial flutter recurrence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Incremental pacing to confirm complete isthmus block may lower flutter recurrence after ablation; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized validation.
BACKGROUND: Complete conduction block of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) reduces atrial flutter recurrences after ablation. Incremental rapid pacing may distinguish slow conduction from complete CTI conduction block. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (67 +/- 9 years) undergoing 55 CTI ablation procedures were included. With ablation, double potentials (DPs) separated by an isoelectric line of > or =30 ms were obtained. Incremental atrial pacing (600-250 ms) was performed from coronary sinus (CS) and low lateral right atrium (LLRA). A <20 ms increase in the DPs distance during incremental pacing was indexed as complete CTI block. In 8 patients, an initial <20 ms DPs distance increase was noted; direct complete isthmus block was suggested and no additional ablation performed. In the remaining, the CTI line was remapped for conduction gaps and additional radiofrequency energy pulses applied. Complete block, as indexed by incremental pacing, occurred in 46 of 55 procedures, with one flutter recurrence (follow-up 8 +/- 2 months): DPs interval variation of 116 +/- 20 to 123 +/- 20 ms (CS), P = 0.21; and 122 +/- 25 to 135 +/- 35 ms (LLRA), P = 0.17. The remaining 9 patients (persistent rate-dependent DPs increase) presented 3 flutter recurrences, P = 0.01: DP distance from 127 +/- 15 to 161 +/- 18 ms (CS), P < 0.001; and 114 +/- 24 to 142 +/- 10 ms (LLRA), P = 0.007. CONCLUSION: Incremental pacing distinguishes complete CTI block from persistent conduction. Such identification, accompanied by additional ablation to achieve block, should minimize flutter recurrences after ablative therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazán et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Atrial flutter (n=52). Incremental atrial pacing vs. Persistent conduction was evaluated on Atrial flutter recurrence (p=0.01). Incremental pacing identified complete cavotricuspid isthmus block, which was associated with significantly fewer atrial flutter recurrences compared to persistent conduction (2.2% vs 33.3%, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: