Key result
Paced PR interval analysis on the surface ECG accurately identified cavotricuspid isthmus block in 100% of patients (31/31), with all cases confirmed by standard coronary sinus pacing.
Why the study?
To evaluate the novel concept of using the paced PR interval on the surface ECG to prove trans-isthmus block following CTI ablation for typical AFl.
Does paced PR interval analysis on the surface ECG accurately confirm cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter?
Observational (n=31)
Does paced PR interval analysis on the surface ECG accurately confirm cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter?
Paced PR interval analysis on the surface ECG is a highly accurate and simple method to confirm cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation, potentially allowing for single-catheter procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Paced PR interval may simplify CTI block confirmation post-flutter ablation; this small cohort leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
AIMS: We aimed to assess the novel concept of using the paced PR interval (PRI) on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) to prove trans-isthmus block after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFl). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with AFl underwent linear radiofrequency ablation of the inferior CTI (6 o'clock). After AFl termination and/or presumed completion of the CTI line, CTI block was proven by atrial pacing by the ablation catheter medial (5 o'clock) and lateral to the line (7 and 9 o'clock). Corresponding PRIs were measured on the surface ECG. CTI block was assumed, if a sudden increase in the PRI was observed by moving the pacing site from 5 to 7 o'clock, and if the latter was longer than at 9 o'clock. Afterwards, bidirectional CTI block was confirmed by differential pacing. Thirty-one patients (mean age 67 ± 16 years, 81% male) underwent CTI ablation, and 18/31 (58%) were in AFl at the time of ablation (cycle length 249 ± 31 ms). Successful CTI block as defined by the PRI method was achieved in 31/31 (100%), and the mean PRIs during pacing at 5, 7, and 9 o'clock were 203 ± 56 ms, 329 ± 70 ms, and 296 ± 66 ms, respectively. Cavotricuspid isthmus block was confirmed in all patients (100%) by coronary sinus pacing with a reversal of the local activation sequence lateral to the isthmus line. CONCLUSION: The method of PRI analysis on the surface ECG to guide CTI ablation is easy to apply and highly accurate in confirming CTI block. This simple technique enables the novel concept of CTI ablation and proof of block with a single catheter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madaffari et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Typical atrial flutter (n=31). Paced PR interval (PRI) analysis on the surface ECG vs. Standard coronary sinus pacing was evaluated on Confirmation of cavotricuspid isthmus block. Paced PR interval analysis on the surface ECG accurately identified cavotricuspid isthmus block in 100% of patients (31/31), with all cases confirmed by standard coronary sinus pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: